segunda-feira, dezembro 28, 2009

Constitutional Council Criticises CNE

Maputo — Mozambique's Constitutional Council on Monday sharply criticised the National Elections Commission (CNE) for the way it had handled the procedures leading up to the 28 October general and provincial elections.
In its ruling proclaiming the election results, the Council pointed out that the calendar for the elections drawn up by the CNE "does not indicate with precision and clarity the deadlines for electoral acts, particularly those for the phase of delivering candidates' nomination papers".
In particular, the CNE announced exactly the same period (1 June to 29 July) for both the registration of parties for the parliamentary elections and for the delivery of candidates' nomination papers.
This procedure was in violation of the law, which regards the registration of parties, and the delivery of nomination papers as quite separate.
The law envisages the possibility of appealing to the Constitutional Council against the CNE's decisions on such matters as the legality of political parties' names and symbols. Yet the CNE effectively made this impossible, since the calendar said that the CNE would decide on the legality of names and symbols only after the end of the period for delivery of nomination papers.
This was not an academic issue. There were strong suspicions that one new party, the PLD (Party of Freedom and Development), chose a turkey as its symbol to confuse the electorate, since the main extra-parliamentary force, the Mozambique Democratic Movement (MDM) also has a domestic bird, a cockerel, as its symbol.
The most flagrant case was that of the PPD (Popular Democratic Party), a completely obscure group, which obviously chose its name in order to steal votes from the much better known PDD (Party of Peace, Democracy and Development), led by the former number two in Renamo, Raul Domingos.
But the CNE's calendar, described by the Council as "incoherent", made it almost impossible to address such issues.
The CNE also had a legal obligation to publish lists of candidates on three separate occasions - first, immediately after the end of the period for presenting nomination papers (29 July); second, after all the nomination papers had been checked for irregularities (5 September); and finally, after any appeals by parties against the lists had been decided by the Constitutional Council (19 September).
In fact, the CNE only posted one set of lists of candidates on its notice board, on the night of 5/6 September. Even this was incomplete, since it only included the lists that were accepted, and not those that the CNE rejected, although the law states clearly that the rejected lists must also be posted.
The Council pointed out that failure to publish the list of candidates immediately after receiving their nomination papers meant that the parties could not check the lists for any omissions. The parties were thus being denied information they needed for any possible appeal against the CNE to the Council.
The Council also noted that three elections were held, not one. The CNE should therefore have submitted three separate sets of minutes to the Council. Instead, the CNE's decisions on the three elections were bundled together in one document. When the Council asked for separate minutes for the separate elections, all it received were two additional photocopies of the same document.
The electoral bodies, the Council added, needed to explain their decisions better, and always notify parties and candidates of those decisions. It would thus be desirable for the CNE and its subordinate bodies "to develop complementary practical mechanisms which, on the one hand, permit greater publicity for its activities, and on the other improve communication and dialogue with the political parties and candidates".
Such measures were important "to raise the level of trust and credibility that the electoral administration should deserve".
But the Council admitted that the CNE was working with badly drafted laws with overlapping deadlines that were difficult to reconcile with each other. A key problem was that the date for the election must be announced by the President of the Republic (on the CNE's advice) at least 180 days in advance.
The Council said this was not enough time - particularly because updating the voter registration cannot occur until the election date is known (because only people aged 18 before or on the date of the election can vote).
The date for the elections should be fixed further in advance, the Council argued, "so as to allow more time for all the other electoral procedures".
A correct timetable for the elections, it said, "requires parliament to fix more realistic deadlines, which allow a properly phased and harmonised sequence of electoral acts, without overlapping".
The Council also criticized the CNE for demanding residence certificates proving that candidates for the provincial assemblies have lived in the province for at least six months. That demand is not in the law, which only requires that candidates show their identity card and their voter card.
For the voter card number indicates the province where the candidate registered to vote, and where he or she presumably lives. The identity card also shows the candidate's address. A third document is therefore unnecessary.
Opposition parties have repeatedly claimed that local authorities are unwilling to issue residence certificates for their candidates. The failure of opposition candidates to obtain these certificates is the main reason why the ruling Frelimo Party was unopposed in 67 of the 141 district constituencies used for the provincial elections.

Source: Allafrica (2009.12.28)

8 comentários:

Jonathan McCharty disse...

O Conselho Constitucional, quando devia efectivamente mandar parar accoes ilegais, corroborrou essas mesmas ilegalidades. Agora aparece como esse "big papa" repetindo as falcatruas largamente denunciadas por varios sectores. Quer dizer, agora e' seguro apontar essas mazelas, porque nada ira alterar!!

Amanha, quando a CNE voltar a pedir "atestados de residencia", este mesmo CC vira em seu suporte, atropelando este seu acordao!!

E' preciso avaliarmos a utilidade de um tal Orgao que, gosta de se apresentar "puritano" e "educador", mas que, na hora H, poe-se a nadar com a corrente de "aguas turvas" e, absolutamente, nada faz!!

Ja chega de teatro e abuso do dinheiro do povo com as mordomias interminaveis, quando na realidade por ele nada fazem!!!!

Reflectindo disse...

Jonathan

Este artigo que não é de AWEPA/CIP, mas da Agência de Informação de Moçambique, AIM, um órgão estatal, veio confirmar o que temos discutido e apontado na blogosfera. Isto tudo veio confirmar o que os vários observadores nacionais e internacionais disseram. Acima de tudo vem a concordar com o parecer do Observatório Eleitoral a este mesmo Conselho Constitucional, submetido a tempo e hora para que os ERROS GRAVES fossem corrigidos. Porém, o CC está agora a agir como que nós não pudéssemos voltar aos seus Acórdões para compararmos com este último.
Este mesmo CC a fazer fortes críticas a CNE estava sim a defender-lhe na hora útil do processo eleitoral. Podemos nos questionar sobre o objectivo desta nova posição. Fazer de contas? Uma de Pôncio Pilatos? Estava planificado para ser assim?

E que critica o Conselho Constitucional?? Eis um dever da Sociedade Civil? Acho que sim, pois que nenhum órgão terá que se tornar DEUS de Mocambique. Todos os órgãos têm que ser criticáveis e sancionáveis.

JONATHAN, a única utilidade deste reconhecimento público que eles (CNE e CC) cometeram, é o encorajamento que nos dá para continuarmos a criticar implacavelmente ao que logicamente soubermos estar errado sem nenhum RECUO nem RECEIO de que não somos juristas, economistas, sociólogos seja lá o que for.

Próspero Ano Novo 2010!

Jonathan McCharty disse...

O Magazine Independente, fala exactamente nestes termos!!
Este Orgao precisa urgentemente de mudar de postura!!!

Reflectindo disse...

Até quando li o que Salomão Moyana fiquei surpreendido por ser exactamente o que escrevi aqui e comentei no blog do Prof Carlos Serra.

Os que se achavam ter contra-argumentos de tudo quando diziamos, deviam voltar a discutir connosco e trazerem esses seus argumentos na blogsfera.

Eu quero saber se uma vitória fraudulenta é doce ou azeda.

Reflectindo disse...

Jonathan, meu irmão,

Este Órgão como qualquer outro órgão em Moçambique, nunca mudará de postura enquanto não houver pressão nossa, uma pressão dos moçambicanos. Custe o que custar temos que fazer uma pressão sem tréguas.

As eleições de 28 de Outubro permitiram-nos muita coisa. Esse conhecimento é a nossa base. Não podemos deixar a quem não tem autoridade moral a meter patranhas no povo.

Anónimo disse...

Right now it looks like Drupal is the top blogging platform out there right now.
(from what I've read) Is that what you're using
on your blog?

my weblog ... http://www.freearticlepublisher.info/

Anónimo disse...

It's my belief mesothelioma is usually the most deadly cancer. It has unusual attributes. The more I look at it the more I am assured it does not conduct itself like a true solid tissues cancer. If perhaps mesothelioma is often a rogue viral infection, so there is the potential for developing a vaccine plus offering vaccination to asbestos uncovered

Here is my blog post :: smart dating

Anónimo disse...

Thanks for the strategies you have contributed here.
Moreover, I believe there are a few factors that keep your auto insurance
premium straight down. One is, to contemplate buying cars that are inside good set of car insurance
companies. Cars that are expensive tend to be at risk of being lost.

Aside from that insurance policies are also based on the value of your car,
so the costlier it is, then the higher the particular premium you only pay.


my webpage - free adult dating sites